Video Abstract
Ning Liao, MD (she/her/hers)
Chief
Department of Breast Surgery, GuangDong Provincial People’s Hospital
Guangzhou, United States
Ning Liao, MD (she/her/hers)
Chief
Department of Breast Surgery, GuangDong Provincial People’s Hospital
Guangzhou, United States
Nanqiu Liu, n/a
surgeon
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, United States
Weiqi Zhang, n/a
Surgeon
GuangDong Provincial People’s Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (People's Republic)
Guochun Zhang, n/a
deputy
GuangDong Provincial People’s Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (People's Republic)
Chongyang Ren, n/a
Surgeon
GuangDong Provincial People’s Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (People's Republic)
A total of 60 patients were included in this study, 22 of whom underwent a robot-assisted lumpectomy and 38 received a conventionally open lumpectomy. The age, BMI (Body Mass Index) and mean tumor size of robot-assisted lumpectomy group and conventionally open lumpectomy group were comparable (P >0.05). All patients were premenopausal except 2 patients. In terms of pathological results, of 22 patients in robot-assisted lumpectomy group, 20 had breast fibroadenoma, 1 had phyllodes tumor and 1 had phyllodes tumor. Of 38 patients in conventionally open lumpectomy group, 28 had breast fibroadenoma, 8 had intraductal papilloma and 2 had phyllodes tumor. The length of incision was significantly shorter in robot-assisted surgery group than that in conventionally open surgery (3.93 cm VS 4.47 cm, P< 0.05). There was no significant difference with respect to intraoperative blood loss in two groups (P >0.05). With regard to incidence of postoperative complications, there was no significant difference in two groups. 2 patients in robot-assisted surgery group and 3 in conventionally open surgery group developed a mild wound infection and were healed after dressing change. Of note, none of patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery showed movement disorders of the upper extremities after surgery. There was no significant difference in the circumference of upper arms before and after robot-assisted surgery, demonstrating that robot-assisted lumpectomy may not incur the lymphedema for a short term. The total operation time of robot-assisted lumpectomy group was significantly longer compared with that in conventionally open lumpectomy group. Patients in robot-assisted surgery group were satisfied with aesthetic outcomes. Robot-assisted breast surgery using indocyanine green guided by ultrasound, yielding a good aesthetic outcome, is a safe alternative of potential value for patients. To our experience, women with tumor larger than 2cm and located in lower inner quadrant are preferable candidates for this technique.
Conclusions: