Colorectal
Andrew M. Fleming, MD
Surgery Resident
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Andrew M. Fleming, MD
Surgery Resident
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Andrew M. Fleming, MD
Surgery Resident
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Leah E. Hendrick, MD, MS
Surgical Oncology Fellow
Moffitt Cancer Center, United States
Julia P. Pedo Freitas, MD
Surgery Resident
Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, United States
Suraj Sarvode Mothi, MPH
Senior Biostatistician
Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States
Ian B. Solsky, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, United States
Danny Yakoub, MD, PhD, FACS
Chief of Surgical Oncology
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA, United States
Andrew J. Murphy, MD
Chief, General Pediatric Surgery Division
Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States
Elizabeth Gleeson, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, United States
Evan S. Glazer, MD, PhD, FACS, FSSO (he/him/his)
Associate Professor of Surgery
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
David Shibata, MD, FACS, FSSO, FASCRS
Professor and Chair of the Department of Surgery
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Surgery
Memphis, TN, United States
Jeremiah L. Deneve, DO (he/him/his)
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Systemic therapy recommendations for appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) are based on data from colorectal cancer (CRC) studies. A more nuanced understanding of the genomic underpinnings of AA could help drive the development of more precise and effective systemic therapies. The current study assessed distinct driver mutations in primary and metastatic AA and CRC using the largest publicly accessible cancer clinicogenomic dataset.
Methods:
The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) dataset “GENIE Cohort v14.0-public,” released September 2023, was queried for CRC and AA samples via cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Exclusion criteria included non-adenocarcinoma histology, mucinous histology, and missing data regarding primary versus metastatic site of origin. Sample-level genomic alterations were compared using Fisher’s exact tests, with multiple hypothesis testing corrected via the Benjamini-Hochberg method. q-values < .01 denoted statistical significance. Volcano plots of log2 alteration ratios and -log10 p-values were used to visualize differential rates of mutations between groups.
Results:
15,117 CRC samples (10,056 primary, 5,061 metastatic) and 300 AA samples (133 primary, 167 metastatic) were included. In primary samples, there were no differences between groups in age, sex, or race, (all q >.05). In metastatic samples, patients with AA were more often female (59.3% vs. 46.0%, q < .01), but similar to those with CRC in age and race (both q >.05). Compared to primary CRC, primary AA had higher rates of GNAS mutations (24.2% vs. 4.8%, q < .0001). Metastatic AA also had higher rates of GNAS mutations than metastatic CRC (15.7% vs. 4.5%, q < .0001). Among GNAS mutations in metastatic AA, R201H (9.2% vs. 0.8%, q < .0001) and R201C (6.1% vs. 0.4%, q < .0001) missense putative driver mutations in the switch I domain on exon 8 of the GNAS protein were more commonly identified than in metastatic CRC. APC mutations were less common in AA than CRC in primary (13.7% vs. 67.0%, q < .0001) and metastatic (8.4% vs. 66.4%, q < .0001) samples. TP53 mutations were also less common in both primary AA (39.4% vs. 68.7%, q < .0001) and metastatic AA (34.0% vs. 73.1%, q < .0001) than in analogous CRC samples.
Conclusions:
Higher rates of oncogenic GNAS mutations are observed in AA than CRC in both primary and metastatic samples, even when excluding mucinous histologies. Investigating GNAS as a potential therapeutic target in GNASR201H and GNASR201C-mutant AA should be prioritized.