Hepato-pancreato-biliary
Hanna Hong, BS
Medical Student
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Hanna Hong, BS
Medical Student
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Hanna Hong, BS
Medical Student
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Chase J. Wehrle, MD
Resident
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Sami Fares, BS
Medical Student
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Henry Stitzel, BS
Medical Student
Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, United States
Bassam Estfan, MD
Associate Professor, Hematology/Oncology
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Suneel Kamath, MD
Associate Professor, Hematology/Oncology
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Smitha Krishnamurthi, MD
Associate Professor, Hematology/Oncology
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Wen Wee Ma, MD
Vice Chair, Precision Oncology; Professor of Hematology/Oncology
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Mazhar Khalil, MD
Staff Surgeon
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Alejandro Pita, MD
Staff Surgeon
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Andrea Schlegel, MD, MPH
Professor, Liver Transplantation; Lerner Research Institute
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Jaekeun kim, MD, PhD
Professor of Surgery
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Koji Hashimoto, MD/PhD
Chairman, Liver Transplantation
Cleveland Clinic, United States
R Matthew Walsh, MD
Chairman, Department of Surgery
Cleveland Clinic, United States
David CH Kwon, MD, PhD
Section Chief, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Professor of Surgery
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Federico Aucejo, MD
Director, Liver Cancer Program
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Twenty-three patients were included, most of whom underwent resection (n=17, 74%), transplant (n=3, 13%) or ablation (n=3, 13%). Median and maximum follow-up were 16 and 45 months respectively. Most patients had positive post-operative ctDNA (n=20, 87%). There was a trend toward reduced recurrence-free survival in patients with positive post-operative ctDNA (13.1 vs. 9.4 months), though this was not statistically significant (Fig. 1A). In terms of post-operative TMB, 14 (60.8%) had detectable TMB versus not detectable (n=9, 39.1%).
Fourteen (61%) patients experienced recurrence, most of whom were post-operative ctDNA+ (n=13, 93%). In patients with CCA recurrence, the dominant mutations were TP53 (31%), ARID1A (31%), and KIT (23%) versus ATM (57%) in patients did not have recurrence (Fig. 1B). Four (11%) patients had sequential testing, all of whom had positive ctDNA pre- and post-operatively (+/+) (Fig. 1C). Three patients showed partial or near complete clearance of their pre-operative mutations (#1, 3-4) whereas one patient showed no change in mutational profile with resection (#2) (Fig. 1C). One patient with sequential testing experienced CCA recurrence; despite near clearance of pre-operative mutations, acquired mutations in KRAS, ARID1A, and CDK12 were noted post-operatively (Fig. 1C).
Conclusions: The high rate of identifiable post-operative ctDNA is striking after curative intent surgery for CCA, and most patients who developed recurrence had positive post-operative ctDNA. Given the high rate of post-operative ctDNA positivity, use of individualized somatic alterations, rather than positivity vs. negativity status alone, may need to be explored for therapy-decision making and tailored treatment design. Further larger-scale studies are needed to investigate the utility of ctDNA in CCA patients.