Hepato-pancreato-biliary
Ankur Tiwari, MBBS
Resident
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, United States
Ankur Tiwari, MBBS
Resident
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, United States
Caitlin A. McIntyre, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgical Oncology
UT San Antonio - Mays Cancer Center
Alamo Heights, Texas, United States
Caitlin A. McIntyre, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgical Oncology
UT San Antonio - Mays Cancer Center
Alamo Heights, Texas, United States
Xuemei Song, -
Biostatistician
UT Health San Antonio, United States
Chen-Pei Wang, PhD
Associate Professor
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, United States
Mio Kitano, MD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
UT Health San Antonio - Mays Cancer Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Colin M. Court, MD, PhD (he/him/his)
Assistant Professor
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Alexander A. Parikh, MD, MPH, FACS, FSSO
Chief of Surgical Oncology in the Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery
UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, United States
A total of 17,486 patients were included, of which 6,431 patients (37%) received NAT and 11,055 (63%) did not. There were 4,227 patients (24%) who underwent vascular resection during the study period. In the entire cohort, the use of NAT was associated with an increased likelihood of vascular resection (OR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.95-2.32, p< .001) as well as a lower pathologic T-stage (T1/2; OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.47, p< .001) and N-stage (N0; OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12-1.32, p< .001). Temporal trends of this association are shown in Figure 1. The use of neoadjuvant therapy increased by 18% per year between 2014 and 2021 (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.17-1.20, p< .0001), while the overall number of vascular resections increased by 2% per year (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), p=0.0036). Within the cohort that received NAT, however, the percentage of patients undergoing vascular resection decreased by 4% per year during the study period (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99, p=0.0018), while there was a non-significant increase in the rate of vascular resection in the patients who did not receive NAT (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.04, p=0.13).
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being utilized in patients undergoing resection for pancreas cancer. Although the rates of vascular resection have increased slightly overall, the use in patients receiving NAT has decreased over time. This finding is potentially secondary to effective downstaging by NAT, although additional studies are warranted to determine causation.