Peritoneal Surface Malignancies
Ekaterina Baron, MD (she/her/hers)
Surgical Resident
Marshfield Medical Center
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Ekaterina Baron, MD (she/her/hers)
Surgical Resident
Marshfield Medical Center
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Ekaterina Baron, MD (she/her/hers)
Surgical Resident
Marshfield Medical Center
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Chih Ching Wu, MD
Surgical Resident
Marshfield Medical Center, United States
Jessica A. Wernberg, MD, FACS
Surgical Oncologist
Marshfield Medical Center, United States
Rohit Sharma, MD, FACS
Surgical Oncologist
Marshfield Medical Center, United States
Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) improve survival in patients with appendix cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Its role in patients with both peritoneal and parenchymal metastases remains unclear. We aimed to assess outcomes of CRS/HIPEC in stage IVC mucinous (MAC) and non-mucinous AC (N-MAC).
Methods:
A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database (2004-2019). MAC, N-MAC, and signet ring cell carcinoma patients with PC and liver and/or lung metastasis were included. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who received CRS/HIPEC, CRS without HIPEC, and only systemic chemotherapy (SCT). Cox regression analysis with adjustment to age, sex, insurance, co-morbidities, histology, and metastasis site was performed.
Results:
Out of 42,888 patients, 950 met the inclusion criteria: 186 received CRS/HIPEC, 586 – CRS, and 196 – SCT. Median age was 58 vs 59 vs 60 years in CRS/HIPEC, CRS, and SCT groups, respectively (p=0.02). CRS/HIPEC was more commonly performed in academic settings (54.3% vs 36.4% vs 43.9%, p< 0.01), in patients with private insurance (63.4% vs 51.8% vs 61.2%, p< 0.01), and in mucinous histology (88.2% vs 48.1% vs 46.4%, p< 0.01). Liver metastases were more common in CRS/HIPEC than in CRS or SCT groups: 96.2% vs 80.5% vs 64.3% whereas lung metastases were more common in SCT: 2.7% vs 12.1% vs 22.4% (p< 0.01). CRS/HIPEC patients received pre- and/or postop systemic chemotherapy less often than CRS patients (33.9% vs 73.1%, p< 0.01).
Median follow-up was 58 (95%CI 54.8-61.2) months. Among all patients, median OS was not reached (NR) in CRS/HIPEC, 22 months in CRS, and 15 months in the SCT group (p< 0.01). OS differed significantly between CRS/HIPEC, CRS, and SCT groups in low-grade MAC (NR vs 50 vs 26 months, p< 0.01) and low-grade N-MAC (NR vs 20 vs 6 months, p< 0.01) and there was no difference in OS in high-grade MAC (35 vs 13 vs 13 months, p=0.30) and high-grade N-MAC (9 vs 10 vs 3 months, p=0.22). In patients with liver metastases, the median OS was longer in CRS/HIPEC: 94 vs 25 vs 15 months, respectively (p< 0.01).
CRS/HIPEC (SCT ref.; HR 0.36; 95%CI 0.26-0.50) and CRS (HR 0.69; 95%CI 0.57-0.85) were associated with longer OS when adjusted to other factors.
Conclusions: Selected low-grade MAC and N-MAC patients with PC and parenchymal metastases can benefit from CRS/HIPEC. Larger studies are needed to assess its efficacy in patients with stage IVC high-grade appendix cancer.